Systems Layers Rapidshare Search' title='Systems Layers Rapidshare Search' />Web 2. Paleoanthropology Graduate Programs. Wikipedia. A tag cloud a typical Web 2. Web 2. 0 themes. Web 2. World Wide Webwebsites that emphasize user generated content, usability ease of use, even by non experts, and interoperability this means that a website can work well with other products, systems, and devices for end users. The term was popularized by Tim OReilly and Dale Dougherty at the OReilly Media. Web 2. 0 Conference in late 2. Darcy Di. Nucci in 1. Web 2. 0 does not refer to an update to any technical specification, but to changes in the way Web pages are designed and used. A Web 2. 0 website may allow users to interact and collaborate with each other in a social media dialogue as creators of user generated content in a virtual community, in contrast to the first generation of Web 1. Examples of Web 2. Facebook, blogs, wikis, folksonomies tagging keywords on websites and links, video sharing sites e. Systems Layers Rapidshare DownloaderList of the most beautiful girls in the world beautiful woman women in Australia Austria Belgium Canada Ireland Germany Netherland New Zealand Norway Sweden. Note to Linux distributors The only executable files that should be installed by a dcraw package are dcraw, cleancrw, and maybe fujigreen, fujiturn, and. You. Tube, hosted services, Web applications apps, collaborative consumption platforms, and mashup applications. Whether Web 2. 0 is substantively different from prior Web technologies has been challenged by World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners Lee, who describes the term as jargon. His original vision of the Web was a collaborative medium, a place where we could all meet and read and write. On the other hand, the term Semantic Web sometimes referred to as Web 3. Berners Lee to refer to a web of content where the meaning can be processed by machines. HistoryeditWeb 1. A diagram showing the milestones in the development of the key layers of the Internet. Systems Layers Rapidshare PremiumWeb 1. World Wide Webs evolution. According to Cormode, G. Krishnamurthy, B. Web 1. 0 with the vast majority of users simply acting as consumers of content. Personal web pages were common, consisting mainly of static pages hosted on ISP run web servers, or on free web hosting services such as Geo. Cities. 1. 11. 2 With the advent of Web 2. Myspace and Facebook, as well as personal blogs on one of the new low cost web hosting services or a dedicated blog host like Blogger or Live. Journal. The content for both was generated dynamically from stored content, allowing for readers to comment directly on pages in a way that was not previously common. Some Web 2. Web 1. For example, a Web 1. Server performance and bandwidth considerations had to be taken into account, and a long comments thread on each page could potentially slow down the site. Terry Flew, in his 3rd edition of New Media, described the differences between Web 1. Web 2. 0 move from personal websites to blogs and blog site aggregation, from publishing to participation, from web content as the outcome of large up front investment to an ongoing and interactive process, and from content management systems to links based on tagging website content using keywords folksonomy. Flew believed it to be the above factors that form the basic change in trends that resulted in the onset of the Web 2. CharacteristicseditSome design elements of a Web 1. Static pages instead of dynamic HTML. Content served from the servers filesystem instead of a relational database management system RDBMS. Pages built using Server Side Includes or Common Gateway Interface CGI instead of a web application written in a dynamic programming language such as Perl, PHP, Python or Ruby. The use of HTML 3. These were often used in combination with spacer GIFs. Proprietary HTML extensions, such as the lt blink and lt marquee tags, introduced during the first browser war. Online guestbooks. GIF buttons, graphics typically 8. HTML forms sent via email. Support for server side scripting was rare on shared servers during this period. To provide a feedback mechanism for web site visitors, mailto forms were used. A user would fill in a form, and upon clicking the forms submit button, their email client would launch and attempt to send an email containing the forms details. The popularity and complications of the mailto protocol led browser developers to incorporate email clients into their browsers. Web 2. 0editThe term Web 2. January 1. 99. 9 by Darcy Di. Nucci, an information architecture consultant. In her article, Fragmented Future, Di. Nucci writes 4The Web we know now, which loads into a browser window in essentially static screenfuls, is only an embryo of the Web to come. The first glimmerings of Web 2. The Web will be understood not as screenfuls of text and graphics but as a transport mechanism, the ether through which interactivity happens. It will. appear on your computer screen,. TV set. your car dashboard. Writing when Palm Inc. Web capable personal digital assistant, supporting Web access with WAP, Di. Nucci saw the Web fragmenting into a future that extended beyond the browserPC combination it was identified with. She focused on how the basic information structure and hyperlinking mechanism introduced by HTTP would be used by a variety of devices and platforms. As such, her use of the 2. Web that does not directly relate to the terms current use. The term Web 2. These authors focus on the concepts currently associated with the term where, as Scott Dietzen puts it, the Web becomes a universal, standards based integration platform. In 2. 00. 4, the term began its rise in popularity when OReilly Media and Media. Live hosted the first Web 2. In their opening remarks, John Battelle and Tim OReilly outlined their definition of the Web as Platform, where software applications are built upon the Web as opposed to upon the desktop. The unique aspect of this migration, they argued, is that customers are building your business for you. Mta Train Game Simulators more. They argued that the activities of users generating content in the form of ideas, text, videos, or pictures could be harnessed to create value. OReilly and Battelle contrasted Web 2. Web 1. 0. They associated this term with the business models of Netscape and the Encyclopdia Britannica Online. For example,Netscape framed the web as platform in terms of the old software paradigm their flagship product was the web browser, a desktop application, and their strategy was to use their dominance in the browser market to establish a market for high priced server products. Control over standards for displaying content and applications in the browser would, in theory, give Netscape the kind of market power enjoyed by Microsoft in the PC market. Much like the horseless carriage framed the automobile as an extension of the familiar, Netscape promoted a webtop to replace the desktop, and planned to populate that webtop with information updates and applets pushed to the webtop by information providers who would purchase Netscape servers. In short, Netscape focused on creating software, releasing updates and bug fixes, and distributing it to the end users. OReilly contrasted this with Google, a company that did not at the time focus on producing end user software, but instead on providing a service based on data such as the links Web page authors make between sites. Google exploits this user generated content to offer Web search based on reputation through its Page.